The reason why Camilla could never be Queen and might not get the opportunity.

1) No teh worlds not gonna end
2) The Head of state used to have discretionary power solely to decide on teh use of nuclear weapons, these were then devolved on consultation to the Prime Minister and war cabinet.
3) Crown opinions are refferred through teh council of state in which those members of teh Royasl family on the civil list have input.
4) As such if the head of state has input, the deputy (heir apparent) agrees then the only person who can succeed to teh corwn without being indited is the serving military officer not involved in teh Campaign (Duke of Cambridge). To save the English crown and with it the Commonwealth of Uk started nations, a referendum reratifying the institution and codifying the constitution with secession of wales and scotland should they so wish by referendum is the logical step to save the monarchy.
5) Respecting teh history of 1997 might still save the crown and teh Express article sets the process out.

Tough econmic times

The Prime Minister needs assistance in dealing with the global economic crisis.

Heres mine:

1) Global audit and seperation of retail ie small holdings normal accounts and investments.
2) Protection of the former to maintain micoreconomic stability and the global economy on a day to day basis and pension funds
3) Audit of the latter to see if they're sustainable and if not hopw to manage default
4) Aid support to ensure that the countries aren't scammed in that process and that democracies don't fall as occurred in teh 1920s and 1930s
5) Negotiation on remaining vorder disputes lodged at the UN to prevent arms proliferation and destructive conflict
6) Referendums on secession and constitutional conventions in all states to ensure that 5) doesn't descend into anarachy and that any country beit republic or monarchy has democratic legitiamacy from Saudi and Syria to Britain and Belarus
7) Referendum in teh UK on whether the Duke of Cambridge should succeed the throne
7)

The alternative to a tit for tat intifada after a use of an Israeli nuke

Since it has been reported on Russia Today yesterday that Israelis are concerned about their nuclear deterrant being used and are therefore less willing to serve in their military, could this be looked at:

If troop numbers fall in Israel could the UN mandate arabic speaking troops to peacekeep the Golan and West Bank (pre 1967 borders) until such time as a viable Palestinian state is recognised internationally after bilateral negotiations between the Israeli Prime Minister and Palestinian Authority?

That way confidence is maintained for the Israeli settlers there so that they could choose to remain as Palestinian citizens should they so wish if the border includes their residences.

That is better than a loss of life on either side and could save life.

When nuclear states seek to reduce their arsenals towards the goal of complete nuclear disarmament because no state can afford them, why is it that Iran keeps its one and spreads offensive rhetoric?

They have civilian power supplied by a neighbouring state (Russia) under international auspices and checks at the Russian end.

Therefore could Iran also put its missiles out of use at the same time as Israel and Pakistan / India / China/ USA/ UK/ France as that way there'd be no need for weapons and no risks of aftershocks if the Guardian report is accurate and there's a bomb being developed near the civilian plant at Natanz (reported repeatedly as the main site in the UK press over the past ten years).

Then saved resources could be used on managed debt default and the Holy sites in the Middle East don't get bombed out of existence by any Iranian reprisals.

M5 crash in Taunton

This is difficult to write and should not be taken as an attempt to prejudge any independant inquiry, but what on earth?

1) Why is the M5 out there at a junction, unlit?
2) Was the road properly surfaced
3) Can like events be avoided in another large snow stormy winter, should teh M5 have a reduced speed limit while it is upgraded to 1 AND 2 or should it be closed more speedily and if so how without taking resources from other busier parts of the road network?

Any idiot watching the reporter on the bridge over the M5 could have judged that in the following morings news casts.