ToryTalkII, Ware returns to cyberspace

A Centre right view on UK politics and the wider world from an British subject by birth and English citizen by Postcode in London, with links to my old uni town whose been abroad both near (Wales / Cymru) and far (Levant, Polska and Malta)

Name:
Location: Cowley, London, Middlesex, United Kingdom

Saturday, March 05, 2011

LSE Director quits

In defence of my dads old bossIf you think that the Lybian funding of Uk higher education is bad, think about it from the following perpespectives:

1) In the nineteenth century when unregulated and funded by the criminal underworld it produced Marx and Hegel and similar systems elsewhere in Europe produced Hitler and the Nazis. Would you want another one like Idi Amin or Pol Pot or Mugabe?
2) The American Ivy League is just as bad and they cross subsidise their countres smaller unis.

3) The Soviets were even worse, look how their methods affected those that implemented them in terms of their health (Kruschev and Andropov who were ruthless in teh ways that they obtained their information)

3b) They learnt their methodologies of of the UK in WW2

4) Statutory regulation of university funding and publication of donatiosn has been attempted many times in the past and always vetoed as detrimental to the national interest, why?

5) My best guess is that its because those institutions with the know how use funds from foreign nations to fund courses on them for the fostering of international cultural links and to aid the poor of London to get jobs and skills (eg Birkbeck and Goldsmiths Cert HEs for those who are actually working in the UK economy lawfully as a way into higher education). Plus some of their certificates have important societal uses. To put it crudely. If the LSE has acted as a ammanah slush fund to fund non militant Immans studying and archeaology in North Africa, whats the problem, the methodology was being used concurrently by The Al Queada enemy for their madrassas

5b) My next best guess is that when this found out or the use of uni power by the crown, the Chancellorships and patronships get rotated by differing members of the Royal Family. Hence the need for universities based on regulated submissions to them and external studentships for those who live within the UK.

6) This has been subverted by people, gangs and other states intelligence agencies to send their agents over on student visas. The reason it is tolerated is that has been used to stop things that they all think are evil such as Militant Islam and terrorism. Some of their methods are illegal and the people you report them to are the Met Police counter terrorism and vice squads, their own embassies, the Foreign and Commonwealth office and the Court of St James.

7) Having seen how this operated can you blame him for wanting to get it regulated to prevent vile manipulations of the financial systems against small states and the unsustainability of intelligence agencies and some of their methods.

In terms of the rail sector contracts and companies are regulated under Eu standard law and contract awarding procedures and publication which successfully restricts this and allows for rail lines to be designed by the UK and devolved governments and lobbied for and against according to teh rule of law and local democracy.

However advice on which firm to invest in is the key decision, any company or advisor that fails to advise about this is a problem institution.Why the Bank governor is rightWhen banks are too big to fail they are bailed out by the state and unsustainable investments continue as occurred in Soviet Russia. This is what did for the Uk economy in the late 1960s-70s with uncontrolled inflation when others in Western Europe were building their economic recoveries on the basis of sustained post war reconstruction.

Hence proper regulation is required especially with credit. Froman economic intelligence perspective small states can set up companies, lawfully invest and use loans for a time and then collapse another economy using unregulated stock exchanges. Hence is there a need for an EU wide Companies House style regulation of Company directors?

This is needed to protect those who invest in their companies similarly to savers and to prevent the next recession wiping out the banking system. The method of that was credit card borrowing by said states faith and community individuals on the basis of recommendations from their groups and to undermine the way teh UK state operates. Hence lower credit card limits and mortgage borrowing as income percentages are needed to be kept in order to prevent inflation and allow for controlled economic advice bankruptcies.

Debt relief orders are needed to be kept for those who are elderly and disabled and on state benefits with better financial advice for them so as to stop them investing in bad business models or unsustainbly large big society projects that don't factor in the potential of a slower repayment of the bank bailout debts owing to the situation in North Africa and any humanitarian aid required to stop Gaddaffi starving his population. Hence any seized assets under the UN sanctions resolution should be spent on humanitarian aid now.

In terms of the rail sector contracts and companies are regulated under Eu standard law and contract awarding procedures and publication which successfully restricts this and allows for rail lines to be designed by the UK and devolved governments and lobbied for and against according to teh rule of law and local democracy.

However advice on which firm to invest in is the key decision, any company or advisor that fails to advise about this is a problem institution.

Why the Bank governor is right

When banks are too big to fail they are bailed out by the state and unsustainable investments continue as occurred in Soviet Russia. This is what did for the Uk economy in the late 1960s-70s with uncontrolled inflation when others in Western Europe were building their economic recoveries on the basis of sustained post war reconstruction.Hence proper regulation is required especially with credit. Froman economic intelligence perspective small states can set up companies, lawfully invest and use loans for a time and then collapse another economy using unregulated stock exchanges. Hence is there a need for an EU wide Companies House style regulation of Company directors?

This is needed to protect those who invest in their companies similarly to savers and to prevent the next recession wiping out the banking system. The method of that was credit card borrowing by said states faith and community individuals on the basis of recommendations from their groups and to undermine the way teh UK state operates.

Hence lower credit card limits and mortgage borrowing as income percentages are needed to be kept in order to prevent inflation and allow for controlled economic advice bankruptcies.Debt relief orders are needed to be kept for those who are elderly and disabled and on state benefits with better financial advice for them so as to stop them investing in bad business models or unsustainbly large big society projects that don't factor in the potential of a slower repayment of the bank bailout debts owing to the situation in North Africa and any humanitarian aid required to stop Gaddaffi starving his population. Hence any seized assets under the UN sanctions resolution should be spent on humanitarian aid now.